Is The Ford Mustang EcoBoost The Pony You Really Want?

Sponsored Links

A “proper” pony car is always necessarily propelled by a big, burly V8. So says conventional wisdom, anyway.

And yet, with the introduction of the latest generation of the iconic Ford Mustang, the decision-makers at the Blue Oval decided it was time to expand upon the standing V6/V8 duo of engine choices with a turbocharged four-cylinder: a throwback to the 2.3L turbo offered in the fox-bodied third-generation car. More shockingly, the ‘Stang’s new turbo-four didn’t even bother to drop the “EcoBoost” moniker, putting an even finer point on the inherent oxymoron that is the four-cylinder pony car.

There are those who like burnouts, and there are those who like the environment; seldom do they overlap.

Sponsored Links

But let’s forget our prejudices for a moment, and not condemn the Ford Mustang EcoBoost without a fair trial. In an editorial published in March by The Drive, David Traver Adolphus lays out a compelling argument for the car, suggesting that the current-generation EcoBoost ‘Stang is the one to have. His reasoning is quite simple: by losing some 130 pounds of weight over the front axle, the Ford Mustang EcoBoost is actually more of a balanced, satisfying driver’s car than the V8-powered GT model.

Furthermore, peaking at over 70 percent of the GT’s 435 horsepower apex, the modern 2.3-liter turbo doesn’t fail to deliver a respectable level of thrill.

The 5.0-liter Coyote V8 in the current, sixth-generation Ford Mustang GT is a peach, to be sure, and the 5.2-liter Voodoo mill found in the ballistic Shelby GT350 and GT350R models is nothing short of a revelation. But let’s not forget that inline-four cylinder engines have flat-plane crankshafts, too, and with the balance of weight being shifted further rearward than on either the GT or the Shelby, the (comparatively) lightweight Ford Mustang EcoBoost might indeed be the most “sportscar” Mustang ever built.

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links

Subscribe to Ford Authority
For around-the-clock Ford news coverage


We'll send you one email per day with the latest Ford updates.

It's totally free.

  • Want to see your Ford vehicle or build featured on Ford Authority? We welcome your submissions. See here for details. ×

Written by Aaron Brzozowski

Aaron Brzozowski is a writer and motoring enthusiast from Detroit with an affinity for '80s German steel. He is not active on the Twitter these days, but you may send him a courier pigeon.

Sponsored Links

One Comment

Leave a Reply
  1. I’m actually glad to see a turbocharged four-cylinder engine on the Mustang’s options list, because it broadens the model’s appeal. That doesn’t mean I would buy one myself, however. The reason is simple: Quite apart from the engine’s horsepower and torque figures–which I understand are quite impressive for the size of the engine–the EcoBoost Mustang sounds far too much like the four-cylinder engine it is to be mistaken for anything else. It’s whiny; it’s gritty; and it’s shrill. It sounds like a four because it is a four. There are those who like four-cylinder sounds, and those who do not: Put me in the latter camp. And make my Mustang a Coyote V-8 with the automatic and all the trimmings. It is a pony car, after all. I’m just not in the target market for a four-cylinder sports car. I never was. I doubt I ever would be. It’s that simple. And if I’m buying a pony car, I’m not going to do it half-heartedly. That means only a V-8 will do. It’s as simple as that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ford Motor Company Recalls Ford F-150, Expedition, Mustang And Lincoln Navigator Over Automatic Transmission Flaw

Camaro ZL1 Tells Us What To Hope For From Ford F-150 Raptor Transmission