Turbo Ponies: Ford Mustang EcoBoost vs. Chevy Camaro 2.0T

Sponsored Links

Gone are the days when a V8 was the only acceptable engine option in an American pony car. Today’s V6 and turbocharged-four engines in the Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro make every bit as much power as the big, heavy V8s of yore, and weigh-down the front axle less doing it.

But which turbocharged, four-cylinder American pony car is the one to have: the Ford Mustang EcoBoost, or the Chevrolet Camaro 2.0T? To answer that, Motor Trend performed an in-depth comparison test, gauging the acceleration, braking, cornering grip, and track prowess of each to determine a winner.

Neither the Ford Mustang nor the Chevy Camaro in this test was without a breadth of optional extras, with the former rocking an optional, $1,995 Performance Pack with a different axle ratio, summer performance tires, and big, four-piston brakes. The Camaro, left without an equivalent performance package, was optioned with a performance all-season tire upgrade and a front-only brake upgrade.

Sponsored Links

That’s likely a large part of the reason that the Ford Mustang EcoBoost – some 230 pounds heavier than the Chevy – was able to best its rival with regard to cornering grip, braking distance, and overall track competence in the hands of Motor Trend‘s resident racing driver, Randy Pobst. Even still, GM’s turbo-four pony car managed a 5.2-second sprint to 60mph versus the Ford Mustang’s 6.3 seconds, despite a 35-horsepower deficit (275HP in the Chevy vs. 310HP in the Ford).

To read the full comparison test and find out which of these “fuel-sipping” American pony cars won, pay a visit to the Motor Trend website.

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links

Subscribe to Ford Authority
For around-the-clock Ford news coverage


We'll send you one email per day with the latest Ford updates.

It's totally free.

  • Want to see your Ford vehicle or build featured on Ford Authority? We welcome your submissions. See here for details. ×

Written by Aaron Brzozowski

Aaron Brzozowski is a writer and motoring enthusiast from Detroit with an affinity for '80s German steel. He is not active on the Twitter these days, but you may send him a courier pigeon.

Sponsored Links

2 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Funny they spend 1500$ on tires for the Chevy, but cheap out with 87 octane for the stang and put premium in the Chevy…What are we talking 10$ a tank? If that… makes you wonder what’s going on here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New Technology Means More Business, Says Ford CEO Mark Fields

Redesigned 2017 Ford Escape Features Increased Storage Space: Feature Spotlight