Ford Authority

The 2018 Mazda 6: Everything The Ford Fusion Could Have Been

The Midwest Automotive Media Association last week hosted its annual Spring Rally at Road America – a two-day event that brings together roughly a hundred automotive journalists from the Midwestern United States to sample some of the latest road-going automobiles from numerous manufacturers. It was there, on the curving, four-mile road course near Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin, that we explored the limits of Mazda Motor Corporation‘s latest mid-size passenger car: the refreshed, 2018 Mazda 6. Our conclusion: Ford might have learned a thing or two about building a fun, engaging mid-sizer from the world’s fifteenth-biggest automaker.

Now, it’s more than a bit unusual for a manufacturer to allow its ordinary, pedestrian passenger vehicles on the race track; the Mazda 6 has little in the way of sporty credentials like monobloc brake calipers, aerodynamic aids, or a boosted/large-displacement engine. In fact, the factory brakes are of the basic, inexpensive “floating” type, and its standard engine is a 2.5-liter inline-four with no power-adders.

Yet so confident is Mazda in the litheness of its chassis and the pluckiness of its base 2.5-liter four-pot that the company allowed its no-frills mid-size commuter onto the race track with any journalist willing to give it a go. We’re glad they did, because more than perhaps any other budget-minded carmaker, Mazda prioritizes fun-to-drive, continually cranking out infectiously jovial daily-drivers that nonetheless deliver remarkable fuel efficiency. Mazda’s current range of normally-aspirated Skyactiv gasoline engines leverage the Atkinson cycle, cam-phasing, and a 13:1 compression ratio (14:1 in markets outside the US) to deliver a crowd-pleasing mix of thrift and thrills, even on widely-available 87-octane.

Exhaust scavenging is so crucial to the engine’s operation that Mazda has graced its Skyactiv 3 and 6 models with what basically amounts to a long-tube racing header from the factory. Zoom zoom indeed.

Weight being the enemy of fun-to-drive, Mazda took pains to remove as much of it as possible from its Skyactiv chassis, resulting in a mid-size sedan that weighs less than certain variants of the third-generation Ford Focus – a car that sells in an entirely different, smaller class of automobile. On the track, the result is a surprisingly fun and refreshing grocery-getter, with a communicative wheel, quick turn-in, and delightful controls, even on automatic-equipped cars like the one we tried. The Mazda 6 gets a bit squirrelly under hard braking, the back end dancing around a bit as it becomes unloaded, but the standard indicators that you’re driving a FWD car at the limit – torque steer and power understeer – are in short supply. It’s remarkably well-balanced.

In short, it’s everything that Ford’s own mid-size Fusion could have been – and quite literally, at that. Ford and Mazda have a long history together, with the former once owning as much as a 33% stake in the former, and eliciting its aid in engineering vehicles from the Ford Probe sports coupe to the Ford Ranger pickup truck. The platform used by the third-gen Focus is an evolution of a platform developed with help from Mazda and Volvo, and the CD3 platform underpinning the first-gen Fusion was Mazda-designed.

Had Ford’s deep involvement with Mazda continued, the current second-generation Ford Fusion might have been every bit as efficient, refreshing, and fun to drive. Not that the Fusion sold particularly poorly in the US or was an especially poor driver’s car, mind you, but the Mazda 6 is just simply better. It has a sharper-looking exterior, an interior that looks like it was plucked from something far more expensive, a bit better fuel efficiency, and perhaps most important of all, a manual transmission option.

Would all that have been enough to save the Ford Fusion from discontinuation, as the automaker prepares to axe “traditional sedans” from its North American lineup? It’s hard to say. But we will say this; Mazda’s modest market share in the US belies its first-rate automotive engineering. If Ford were ever in need of a partner to bring out a world-class Honda Accord-fighter, it would need only look to its past alliances.

We look forward to your hate mail.

Aaron Brzozowski is a writer and motoring enthusiast from Detroit with an affinity for '80s German steel. He is not active on the Twitter these days, but you may send him a courier pigeon.

Subscribe to Ford Authority

For around-the-clock Ford news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest Ford updates. It's totally free.


  1. Karl

    I sell both Mazda and Ford and while I agree with you that ford should have retained platform developments for cars with a Mazda, I disagree that the current Mazda 6 superiority to the Fusion. I always choose the Fusion over the 6 as my personal car and I like a drivers car. The 6 is nice but overrated compared to fusion. The fusion feels more solid and much quieter on the road and I prefer to Fusions on the road handling feel to the 6 electronic feel. Plus the Fusion offers more tech, features and options that blows the 6 away.

  2. Michael

    I love my 2017 Fusion Sport. Hate those Mazdas. Ford discontinuing auto production assures I will never buy a Ford again.

  3. vbondjr

    Let’s break this down with all honesty. Everything Ford has SUCKS! and I mean everything! There is no car in the ford lineup (Mustang included, even as good as the Mustang is right now) Ford needs to completely redo everything in their whole inventory of cars. Here’s the thing, its not that people don’t like sedans, it’s that people loathe Ford sedans. If Ford was smart (which they aren’t) we would have cars like the Australian Ford Falcon (sedan and Ute), a better mustang, the Ranger would have been here a while ago, the Everest would be here along with Bronco. But it is what it is. Oh well


Leave a comment