• We are currently looking for experienced automotive journalists and editors to join our team.  Make $60k-$80k per year doing what you love. We are also looking for an experienced forum moderator to join our team. See details here. ×

2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz EPA Fuel Economy Ratings Can’t Match Maverick

Sponsored Links

When the 2022 Ford Maverick was revealed earlier this morning, the most surprising thing about the new compact pickup (other than its low price tag) was its excellent 40 miles-per-gallon EPA estimated fuel economy rating. This is truly an amazing number for a truck of any kind, hybrid or not. However, the same cannot be said for the Maverick’s recently-revealed rival – the 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz, which is a huge disappointment in that regard.

The Hyundai Santa Cruz is available in both front- and all-wheel-drive configurations, just like the Maverick, as well as with two different 2.5L I-4 powerplants – one naturally-aspirated engine, and one with a turbocharger. The N/A mill is targeted to produce 190+ horsepower and 180+ pound-feet of torque, while the turbocharged motor is expected to make 275+ horsepower and 310+ pound-feet of torque.

Both are mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission, also just like the Maverick. However, the “Sports Adventure Vehicle,” as Hyundai calls it, offers up fuel economy that’s closer to the mid-size Ford Ranger than the compact pickup that it really is.

The AWD turbocharged Hyundai Santa Cruz returns a mere 19 miles-per-gallon in the city, 27 on the highway, and 22 combined. The FWD non-turbo model is slightly better, with EPA ratings of 21/26/23, while the AWD non-turbo is rated at 21/27/23. For reference, the much larger Ranger, which is powered by Ford’s 2.3L EcoBoost I-4 that makes 270 horsepower and 310 pound-feet of torque, is rated at 21/26/23 miles-per-gallon city/highway/combined.

Meanwhile, Ford says that the base Maverick, which is powered by the automaker’s 2.5L Atkinson cycle four-cylinder hybrid drivetrain, is rated to produce 191 (total system) horsepower and 155 pound-feet of torque and has an EPA-estimated targeted fuel economy of 40 miles-per-gallon in the city. That’s a truly eye-opening difference, particularly for those cross-shopping these two models.

It’s also worth noting that the Maverick’s final EPA ratings are likely to be accurate as well, though some tend to change dramatically. The automaker has been on the money with its predictions in recent months, including its projected figures for the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E, which was spot on for most models and even a bit underrated for others.

We’ll have more on the Maverick and its competition soon, so be sure and subscribe to Ford Authority for more Ford Maverick news and 24/7 Ford news coverage.

  • Sweepstakes Of The Month: 2021 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 plus $25K in cash. Details here.
Sponsored Links

Subscribe to Ford Authority
For around-the-clock Ford news coverage


We'll send you one email per day with the latest Ford updates.

It's totally free.

Written by Brett Foote

Brett's lost track of all the Fords he's owned over the years and how much he's spent modifying them, but his current money pits include an S550 Mustang and 13th gen F-150.

Sponsored Links

2 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. A foreign copy of a domestic brand model is always inferior. The Ford Maverick will outsell anything that Hyundai can ever offer anywhere in the world, except in South Korea.

  2. This is a pretty incomplete comparison. Ford hasn’t announced highway estimates for the fwd only hybrid option or any estimates for the gas only version.

    If you go off the more aerodynamic Bronco with the same 2.0l Ecoboost with AWD you get a pretty standard 21/26/23. Which is the same as the Ranger and same as the Santa Cruz.

    So, if you compare the top engines, it’s a wash except the designed and built in America Santa Cruz can tow more, has more horsepower and more torque. I think it will lose on price pretty handily though it is going for the Subaru crowd that will pay more over the truck crowd that wants utility over anything else.

    A 9+ second 0-60 isn’t going to be very exciting to drive even if I’m sipping gas in town with the hybrid version. A 8+ 0-60 isn’t much better for the 2.0l Maverick when the Ranger and F-150 smoke both small trucks in acceleration. It’s all about tradeoffs with these small trucks.

    That said, I’m still looking at getting the hybrid Maverick over the Santa Cruz mostly because I don’t need to tow anything and most of my driving these days is short distance city driving. I just need something that can haul home improvement supplies better than my CUV.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2022 Ford Maverick Revealed With Sub $20K Price Tag, Standard Hybrid Powertrain

Consumer Reports Study Highlights Lesser Known Dangers Of Big Trucks