In recent weeks, Ford Authority has compared the all-new 2022 Ford Bronco Raptor to its fellow off-road-focused model, the Ford F-150 Raptor, as well as its chief rival, the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392. Now, we’re taking a close look at how the Ford Bronco Raptor compares to the Ford Bronco Badlands four-door (since the Bronco Raptor is only available as a four-door) equipped with the Sasquatch Package, itself a highly-capable off-road vehicle, albeit one lacking the equipment and specs of the Raptor variant.
2022 Ford Bronco Raptor | 2022 Ford Bronco Badlands Sasquatch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Wheelbase (inches) | 116.5 | 116.1 | |
Overall Length (inches) | 191 | 190.5 | |
Overall Width* (inches) | 85.7 | 76.3 | |
Overall Height (inches) | 77.8 | 73.9 | |
Front Track Width (inches) | 73.2 | 65 | |
Rear Track Width (inches) | 73.6 | 65 | |
Curb weight (pounds)** | 5,733 | 5226/5,320** | |
* with mirrors folded | |||
2.3L/2.7L |
On the outside, the Bronco Raptor and Badlands trim with the Sasquatch Package are virtually identical in terms of wheelbase and overall length, but the Raptor is significantly wider and taller, with front and rear track widths that are over 8 inches wider than the more basic Bronco. The Bronco Raptor is also several hundred pounds heavier than the Badlands Sasquatch thanks to all of its extra equipment and girth, too.
Dimension | 2022 Ford Bronco Raptor | 2022 Ford Bronco Badlands Sasquatch |
---|---|---|
Seating Capacity (passengers) | 5 | 5 |
Front Headroom (inches) | 40.8 | 40.8 |
Front Legroom (inches) | 43.1 | 43.1 |
Front Shoulder Room (inches) | 57.1 | 57.1 |
Front Hip Room (inches) | 55.9 | 55.9 |
Rear Headroom (inches) | 40.1 | 40.1 |
Rear Legroom (inches) | 36.3 | 36.3 |
Rear Shoulder Room (inches) | 56.5 | 56.5 |
Rear Hip Room (inches) | 54.8 | 54.8 |
In terms of interior space, these two models are predictably identical in every measurable way. The Bronco Raptor does feature some things that aren’t available on the regular model, however, including Code Red accents and paddle shifters, along with a digital gauge cluster.
2022 Ford Bronco Raptor | 2022 Ford Bronco Badlands Sasquatch (Standard) | 2022 Ford Bronco Badlands Sasquatch (Optional) | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine | 3.0L EcoBoost V6 | 2.3 EcoBoost I-4 | 2.7L EcoBoost V6 |
Power (hp) | 400+ | 275* | 315* |
Torque (Ib-ft) | 415+ | 315* | 410* |
Transmission | 10-speed automatic | 10-speed automatic | 10-speed automatic |
Transfer Case | 2-speed on-demand | 2-speed on-demand | 2-speed on-demand |
Rear Axle Ratio | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
Towing (Ibs) | 4,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 |
Payload (Ibs) | 1100 | 1,370 | 1,370 |
* regular 87 octane |
The same goes for powertrains, as the Bronco Raptor is currently the only Bronco model available with Ford’s 3.0L EcoBoost V6, which is expected to produce over 400 horsepower and 415 pound-feet of torque. The Badlands Sasquatch, meanwhile, is available with two engine choices – Ford’s 2.3L EcoBoost I-4, which produces 275 horsepower and 315 pound-feet of torque on 87-octane fuel, or the 2.7L EcoBoost V6, which makes 315 horsepower and 410 pound-feet of torque on cheap gas. All three of these powerplants are mated to Ford’s 10-speed automatic transmission, while the Bronco Raptor can tow a bit more than its regular cohort.
Suspension | 2022 Ford Bronco Raptor | 2022 Ford Bronco Badlands Sasquatch |
---|---|---|
Damper type | Fox Live Valve with position sensitive dampers and Fox 3.1 internal bypass dampers with integrated resevoirs | Bilstein Position Sensitive Dampers |
Damper diameter (inches) | 3.1 | Not provided |
Front Suspension Type | Low-mass independent | Independent with twin alloy A-arms and coil-over springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Five-link solid rear axle with Panhard rod and outboard coilover springs | Five-link solid rear axle with Panhard rod and outboard coilover springs |
Front Suspension Travel (inches) | 13 | 9.4 |
Rear Suspension Travel (inches) | 14 | 10.3 |
Front axle | Dana 44 AdvanTEK M210 with Spicer Performa-TraK electronic locking differential | Dana AdvanTEK with Spicer Performa-TraK electronic locking differential |
Rear axle | Dana 50 heavy-duty AdvanTEK M235 solid differential with Spicer Performa-TraK electronic locking differential | Dana 44 AdvanTEK with Spicer Performa-TraK electronic locking differential |
The other big differences between these Broncos come in the form of suspension, where the Bronco Raptor is very well equipped with Fox Live Valve dampers and beefed-up Dana 44/50 differentials, offering significantly more suspension travel than the Badlands Sasquatch and its Bilstein position-sensitive dampers can provide.
2022 Ford Bronco Raptor | 2022 Ford Bronco Badlands Sasquatch | |
---|---|---|
Approach Angle (degrees) | 47.2 | 43.2 |
Departure Angle (degrees) | 40.5 | 37 |
Breakover Angle (degrees) | 30.8 | 26.3 |
Ground Clearance (inches) | 13.1 | 11.5 |
Maximum Water Fording (inches) | 37 | 33.5 |
That equipment makes a big difference in terms of off-road specs as well, as the Bronco Raptor boasts superior approach, departure, and breakover angles, more ground clearance, and increased maximum water fording capability when compared to the Badlands Sasquatch.
2022 Ford Bronco Raptor | 2022 Ford Bronco Badlands Sasquatch | |
---|---|---|
Wheel size (inches) | 17×8.5 | 17×8.5 |
Wheel type | beadlock capable cast aluminum/forged | beadlock capable forged aluminum |
Tire size (inches) | 37 | 35 |
Tire type | 37×12.50R17LT BFGoodrich KO2 All-terrain | 315/70R17 Goodyear Territory M/T |
Some of those specs are also aided by the Bronco Raptor’s massive 37-inch tires, which are a bit larger than the Bronco Sasquatch’s also large 35-inch units. In either case, those tires are wrapped around 17-inch beadlock capable wheels, however. All of this extra equipment and capability obviously costs more, of course, as the Bronco Raptor starts out at $69,995 – quite a bit more than the Badlands Sasquatch four-door at $50,425.
We’ll have more in-depth comparisons like this to share soon, so be sure and subscribe to Ford Authority for more Ford Bronco news and 24/7 Ford news coverage.
Comments
Since both versions of the Bronco have 2.7 engines, 4.7 diff ratios, the Raptor is running 37’s vs 35’s on the Badlands and is heavier, why did Ford only rate the Badlands at 3,500 lbs towing vs the Raptor’s 4,500 lbs? Also, shouldn’t the Raptor version be running diffs lower than 4.7 (like 5.13) to compensate for the larger tires?
Towing – D50 vs D44 rear axle.
More power instead of gearing to make up the tire size difference.
Dana 50 Advantek Heavy Duty, reinforced hitch mount, a lot more power from the 3.7, and a reinforced frame. Makes sense that it would tow more.
Sorry, 3.0 liter
Yeah this thing swamps every other vehicle in off-road capability. Nothing close. If the RTI score of the F150 Raptor 37, with the same suspension and a far longer wheel base are anything to go by, we could be looking at a score of well over 700 with the sway bar CONNECTED. Combine that with the insane composure of the 37 pack’s suspension, ridiculous angles only beaten by the V6 Rubicon Xtreme Recon (which is comically underpowered), and the best water fording of any vehicle out there, and it isn’t even a close contest.
Obviously there are off-road vehicles that do certain things better. The Defender has more luxury and better on-road handling, the other Raptors and the TRX are more livable and have better working capability, and the aforementioned Rubicon Xtreme Recon has better approach and break over angles. Any side by side over the 15k dollar mark will likely beat this in capability (though then again, those are unsafe to drive on roads). But when you add up all of the off-road tallies and technologies and combine it with a generally livable interior, unmatched overall capability among cars and surprisingly good road manners, it is impossible to really give this vehicle any faults.
And shut up about the fenders. Looks are subjective. I think they look awesome and make it look even more badass, some people think it looks dumb. Don’t rip and tear into something that is 50/50 and say nobody likes it when there are many people that do.
That fenders bit is for the general comment section, not FA.